Several female members of the Punjab Assembly (MPAs) from the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) – elected to the House on reserved seats – either do not possess the necessary educational credentials or have submitted forged degrees to the Election Commission in order to fulfil the criteria for selection on a reserved seat, sources told Daily Times.
In addition, it is being alleged that both the party and the Election Commission have turned a blind eye to these irregularities.
These claims are corroborated by a petition, filed before an election tribunal by one Seemal Kamran – who is also currently a PML-Q MPA from Punjab – against two of her party colleagues, Amina Jahangir and Majida Mir. Although the petition – filed on April 17, 2008 – was withdrawn soon afterwards, ostensibly due to political pressure from within the party, the evidence attached with it has not been refuted by any quarters or in any court of law. Seemal had lodged two separate applications before the election tribunal against Majida and Amina Jahangir – alleging that both women had presented fake degrees before the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to secure seats in the Punjab Assembly (PA).
Case against Majida: In the application filed against Majida, Seemal contended that she violated the law by appending a fake pass-result intimation with her nomination papers. The application states that doubt was cast on the educational qualifications of the respondent in light of a duplicate secondary school certificate, placed on the record and dated October 20, 2006. In contrast, according to Majida’s documents, she passed the FA exam in 1979. The application filed before the tribunal goes on to explain that the degree issued by the Punjab University (PU) under Roll No 112843 in the year 2003 in the name of Majida Ghulam Nabi – ‘son’ of Ghulam Nabi of Lahore – does not match the gazette notification for the BA/BSc Annual Examination 2003 issued by PU. In the gazette, the name of one Farhana Shaheen – daughter of Muhammad Din Shaheen of Sargodha – appears against Roll No 112843. In light of these arguments, the petitioner pleaded that Majida could not hold the MPA seat under Article 8D of the Conduct of General Elections Order, 2002 and her name should be struck down from the PML-Q’s priority list of the MPA seat quota for female members.
Case against Amina: Seemal filed the other application against Amina soon after the latter was elected to the Punjab Assembly. The petitioner stated that Amina did not hold a bachelors degree in any discipline or any degree recognised as equivalent thereto by the University Grants Commission (UGC) – now the Higher Education Commission – under the UGC Act 1974. The petition maintained that the returning officer (RO) rejected the MPA’s nomination papers because she was underage, as the age of the respondent was 23 years according to her vote certificate. The copy of the Computerised National Identity Card (CNIC) – with the date of birth as 1984 – appended with the nomination papers was fake too, the application stated. It said Amina also did not append copies of her matric and FA certificates with her nomination papers. The application went on to contend that Amina had filed an appeal against the RO’s decision and succeeded to get an order in her favour on the basis of ‘bogus’ documents. “The respondent produced before the appellate tribunal her birth certificate to prove her age with the father name’s as Sardar Pervaiz Ali Khan. However, the result gazette and BA degree from the Islamia University of Bahawalpur showed her father’s name as Sardar Mehmood Ali Khan,” the application produced before the election tribunal in April 2008 states. Later, the application went on to state, a writ petition was filed in the Lahore High Court by a certain Amina Mehmood – daughter of Sardar Mehmood Ali Khan – claiming therein that the degree appended with the nomination papers by the MPA was awarded to her instead of the respondent. Amina Mehmood submitted that Amina Jahangir is the daughter of Sardar Pervaiz Ali Khan, who is her (Amina Mehmood) father’s brother. Seemal had stated in the application that the court was about to take a decision in Amina Mehmood’s favour, but the MPA managed to ‘manoeuvre’ the withdrawal of the writ petition. Seemal also sought the MPA’s removal from office on the basis of the evidence she produced in her petition before the tribunal.
Sources within the PML-Q told Daily Times that the party leadership intervened at this point and managed to compel Seemal to withdraw both her applications a few months after they were filed on April 17, 2008 – the date of the filing of the petitions. Both the accused MPAs were holding seats in the Punjab Assembly on the quota reserved by the PML-Q for female party members and removal of either one of them could have cleared the path for Seemal to become an MPA, the sources added. Sources said the party leadership ‘fulfilled the promise made to Seemal’ in return for her withdrawing the two applications by giving her a seat in the Punjab Assembly, which was made possible by the death of PML-Q MPA Ghazala Farhat.
Party concerned: Sources revealed that some other female PML-Q members were now trying to reopen the two cases in hopes of becoming MPAs. The PML-Q leadership is gravely concerned about the possibility of facing extreme embarrassment if the cases are reopened, especially at a time when a number of people have been exposed and removed from both the national and provincial assemblies for submitting fake degrees. PML-Q leader Kamil Ali Agha stated that the party has never supported anyone who tried to benefit through unfair means. He said the PML-Q ‘scrutinises’ its members thoroughly before forwarding their names for any office, which is why compared to other political parties, ‘very few’ PML-Q members have had to face public embarrassment. Agha said the leadership has never forced anybody from concealing the truth. The PML-Q would never side with anyone trying to benefit through fraudulent means and would take strict action if any such case is reported about any of its members, he added.
Misunderstanding: Relating with her version of events to Daily Times, Majida said Seemal had taken the application back ‘on her own accord’ within a few weeks of submitting it to the election tribunal. There are no fresh manoeuvres going on against her within the party, she added. Majida said she stood by her previous statements that all of her documents are genuine. Giving an almost identical statement, Amina Jahangir told Daily Times that Seemal had withdrawn the application against her after a few of the hearings on her accord. “It was a misunderstanding created between us by the opposition, but Seemal realised the conspiracy soon enough and withdrew the application,” she added.
Denial: However, Seemal said she had “got nothing to do with the applications and somebody else lodged both applications in her name”. She denied ever pursuing the cases and went as far as saying that she never hired any lawyers to represent her. Not surprisingly, when questioned, Seemal refused to say why she never took any legal action against the people who misused her name before the election tribunal. To add another twist to the tale, one of the lawyers who represented Seemal told Daily Times that Seemal herself lodged the applications against both the MPAs, asking for her due right of holding a provincial assembly seat. Punjab Chief election commissioner Akhtar Hussain Sabir told this scribe that election tribunals do not pursue any cases once the petitioner withdrew them.
(via Daily Times)
Recent Comments